Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming our society, but its rapid development poses major challenges in terms of ethics, security and respect for fundamental rights. It is in this context that the European Union introduced theAI Act, a pioneering legislation aimed at regulating the use of AI to ensure responsible and transparent use. But what does this regulation actually contain? And what impact will it have on businesses and users ?

What is the AI Act?

THEAI Act is the first legal framework in the world entirely dedicated to artificial intelligence. It aims to strike a balance between innovation and the protection of citizens by imposing strict standards on AI systems based on their level of risk.

Main goals of the AI Act:

• Supervising the uses of AI by ranking systems according to their level of risk.
• Protecting fundamental rights citizens against potential abuses of AI.
• Ensuring transparency and security AI-based technologies.
• Encouraging innovation thanks to a clear and structured legal framework.

A classification of AI systems according to their level of risk

The AI Act takes a risk-based approach, dividing AI systems into four categories:

1. Unacceptable risk — total ban

Some AI systems are considered too dangerous to be authorized in the European Union. This includes:

• The systems of social rating, inspired by the Chinese model, which assess and classify individuals based on their behaviors.
• AIs used to manipulate or exploit human vulnerabilities.
• Some forms of real-time biometric recognition in public spaces (except for specific exceptions, such as the fight against terrorism).

2. High risk — Strict regulations

AI systems that could affect the safety or fundamental rights of citizens are subject to strict obligations, including:

• The AI tools used in Recruiting, the health care, the justice, or the critical infrastructures.
• Decision-making AI systems in the banking and financial fields.
• Large-scale surveillance technologies.

3. Limited risk — Transparency requirement

These systems must comply with transparency obligations so that users know that they are interacting with an AI. Examples:

• Chatbots and virtual assistants.
• AI-based image or text generation systems (like ChatGPT or DALL·E).
• Deepfake tools, as long as their use is clearly reported.

4. Minimal risk — no specific restrictions

AI systems with little or no risk are not subject to specific regulatory requirements. This includes:

• Recommendation systems (e.g. streaming platforms).
• Logistic optimization algorithms.

What are the requirements for high-risk systems?

Businesses that develop or use high-risk AI systems will have to:

• Conduct a conformity assessment before they are put on the market.
• Ensuring human supervision to avoid purely algorithmic decision-making.
• Ensuring increased transparency on the functioning and use of data.
• Implement risk management systems and regular audits.

Who will be responsible for enforcing the AI Act?

To ensure the effective application of this regulation, several entities will be involved:

• The European AI Office : responsible for the supervision and harmonization of rules throughout the EU.
• Competent national authorities : each EU country will have to designate an entity responsible for monitoring the compliance of local businesses.
• The European Committee for Artificial Intelligence : responsible for advising the European Commission and coordinating the Member States.

What is the impact for businesses and users?

For businesses

The AI Act represents a compliance challenge but also a opportunity : Businesses that adopt good AI practices now will gain credibility and competitiveness. Europe seeks to stimulate innovation while imposing safeguards against potential excesses.

However, some experts fear that these strict regulations may hampers Europe's competitiveness in the global AI race. By imposing high compliance and transparency requirements, the AI Act could slow innovation and make it more difficult to compete with regions like the United States and China, where regulation is more flexible. This constraint could lead some European companies to relocate or limit their ambitions in the AI sector.

For users

European citizens will benefit from a better protection of their data and their rights. AI will become more transparent and ethical, thus avoiding abuses related to misinformation, manipulation, or algorithmic discrimination.

Conclusion: Europe, a pioneer in the regulation of AI

THEAI Act positions Europe as a world leader in the regulation of artificial intelligence. Thanks to an approach based on risk level, this legislation aims to balance innovation and the protection of fundamental rights. While it imposes new responsibilities on businesses, it also contributes to building a safer and more reliable AI ecosystem, beneficial for all.

However, the question remains: Does this regulation protect innovation or does it hinder Europe's ability to compete with global AI giants? The future will tell us whether this rigorous framework will allow Europe to position itself as a major player in AI or if, on the contrary, it will slow down its technological development.

‍